How it all started…
The idea for writing ‘Schools of Thought’: Lessons to learn from schools doing things differently came to us when we were discussing how, although most schools were inclusive places which did not prioritise any one set of ideas over another, there were some schools which did define themselves through one, unifying, idea. And the more we talked about it the more fascinating it became. Why put one idea above all others? And why do parents so strongly connect with that idea that they are willing to choose the schools that do this over others which may have better academic results, or facilities, or sports teams? Furthermore, these ideas were complex: single sex schools are in the tiny minority, but for those parents who send their sons and daughters to such schools it is a big statement that can put them outside the prevailing orthodoxies of society. We began writing down some of the big ideas that schools organise themselves around, and we settled on this list of seven chapters:
1: Faith schools
2: Single-sex schooling
3: Traditional and progressive approaches to education
4: Schools with a focus on creativity
5: Developing curricula and assessment
6: Use of technology in schools
7: Wellbeing in schools
And this led on to another issue: namely, how well do we know these schools? We may have strong opinions on, say, single-sex schools, or faith schools, or schools which organise their curriculum around play, or gaming, but how well do we actually know them, what they do, what their typical day looks like.
Most people will attend a couple of schools themselves and, if they’re not teachers, will only encounter them again when they are parents. Even if they are teachers they will only work in a handful of schools in their careers. There are obvious exceptions to this: if you’re a school inspector you will visit other schools, but you won’t be seeing the school as it runs day-to-day, and proportionally it is a vanishingly small fraction of the schools in society. The same will go for policy makers and politicians: very few will spend any extended time in the schools whose future they will determine, and every visit, just like an inspector, will be an experience shaped around who they are, rather than what the school is like.